Archive for the ‘sex’ Category

Rev. Jeremiah Wright back in the news

September 9, 2008

Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barak H. Obama’s spiritual advisor for decades, and who conducted the marriage ceremony between Barak and his Harvard Law School lawyer wife, is back in the news again.

The good Rev. Wright had an affair with a married woman.

Given that the woman appears to be white, and that the Rev. Wright has stated, in public, on the record, and on tape, that the CIA invented AIDS as way to conduct genocide against the black race, I just hope the good Rev. Wright was wearing a latex condom.

HT to the Confederate Yankee.

UN "Peacekeepers" running true to form

November 4, 2007

The BBC reports:

Sri Lanka has promised to look into allegations that 108 of its UN peacekeepers in Haiti paid for sex, in some cases with underage girls.

Earlier this year more than 700 peacekeepers in Ivory Coast were suspended and in recent years, peacekeepers in Liberia and the Democratic Republic of Congo have also been accused of sexual exploitation.

This is just another example in a long history of abuse by so-called UN “Peacekeepers.”

Let us not forget Gary Studds…

August 29, 2007

The late congressman Gary Studds (democrat, Massachusetts) was a married (to a woman) congressman who got caught having sex with an underage male congressional page.

Luckily for him, he was a democrat. His party supported him, the MSM praised him for his bravery, and both worked to have him re-elected multiple times.

Senator Craig, on the other hand, is a Republican. He will be vilified and then crucified in the MSM/DNC for tapping his foot in a public restroom.

Leftist Purtains

June 8, 2007

If attacking his wife is the best the left can come up against Fred Thompson, political comedians are in for full employment for a while.

Via Ace is Dr. Helen’s view on this case of sexual prudism from the the so-called “liberal” left:

When I look at my husband with affection, am I leering?

I guess not since I’m a woman and can do no wrong except for being a right-leaning libertarian. However, if you’re a man, particularly a Republican man, who looks at his wife with affection, you are now accused of “leering”–especially if you are Fred Thompson.

This is yet another example of a woman who deep down believes that men have no right to leer at women, lest it be considered a sex offense. And she is not alone, there are many other women who feel that unless one is Bill Clinton or the object of their own lecherous desires (of course, for these women, their own desire is called empowerment–not lechery!), a regular joe has no right to look at a woman–not even in pictures–with desire in his heart. In their eagar quest to control men’s sexual rights, some “feminist” women (and other prudish ones too!) go to extremes to shame, expose or intimidate men who let their lust for women dare come to the surface.

Ace then nails the liberal duckspeak on the subject:

Feminists continue insisting that it’s empowering to fuck everything that moves, except your actual husband, who must be sexually punished as a state-sanctioned enforcer of The Oppressive Patriarchy.

Old, Hateful, Barbaric Rule: Women must keep their eyes averted when speaking to their superiors, men

New, Empowering, Enlightened Rule: Men must keep their eyes averted when speaking to their superiors, women

There’s such a fine line between stupid and clever.

Honestly, The Feminists Who Put Out (TM) are really ruining their “pro-sex street cred” by constantly nattering on about everyone’s base sexual impulses.

Why don’t you all just chill out, pop open a bottle of wine, and dig on the cool grooves of kd lang and leave the rest of us alone?

Am I to understand it’s wrong for Fred Thompson to leer at his wife, and yet the lefty feminists have no problem with Bill Clinton leering at 22-year-old Monica Lewinksy’s thong, nor turning her into a Human Humidor?