Saunders on the 1st debate

She points out:

Kerry looked good and talked better. But every argument Kerry hurled against Bush also worked against Kerry.

Consider Kerry on the president’s mistake in going after Saddam Hussein before capturing Osama bin Laden. Or, as Kerry intoned, “We can’t leave a failed Iraq. But that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a mistake of judgment to go there and take the focus off Osama bin Laden.” I reread Kerry’s very long and also ponderous remarks before he voted in favor of the October 2002 resolution authorizing force in Iraq. Kerry never mentioned Osama bin Laden. (Is that the fault of Bush, too?)

More Kerry: “Thirty-five to 40 countries in the world had a greater capability of making weapons at the moment the president invaded (Iraq) than Saddam Hussein.”

Again: Why did Kerry vote for the war resolution?

Kerry’s apologists say that the resolution did not authorize the war. Or that it only authorized U.S. force under certain conditions, such as moving against Iraq with the agreement of the United Nations. Not true. The resolution said, “The president is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate” (my italics) to defend U.S. interests and enforce the U.N. Security Council resolutions that Hussein was flouting.

What’s more, Bush had warned the United Nations that it would be irrelevant if it failed to enforce its resolutions even as Kerry says he believed Bush would only go to war as a “last resort.”

Kerry missed these important signposts — and he wants to lead America?

when Kerry attacked Bush on Iraq, he unwittingly crafted a grand argument against himself. Either Kerry voted for a war that, by his own lights, he should have seen as wrong, or if he knew it was wrong, he voted for it anyway.

The more Kerry argues that Bush should have known better than to go to Iraq, the more the latter scenario seems the more likely case.

My beef, however, is that Bush was so busy pointing out what he calls Kerry flip-flops that he failed to highlight Kerry’s real shortcoming: That he voted for a war, then failed to support it. Bush can joke about how Kerry said he voted for $87 billion in troop funding before he voted against it. Worse, however, is the chilling fact that Kerry withheld his support for the spending bill after he told “Face the Nation” it would be reckless and “irresponsible” to vote against it.

At the debate, Kerry said he made a mistake in how he “talk(s) about the war,” but “the president made a mistake in invading Iraq. Which is worse?”

This might be even worse: thinking the war was a mistake, but voting for it anyway.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: